Net Neutrality

Looking now at the issue of 'net neutrality' for the first time, I conclude that it's about everything wrong with "you," which in this sense may mean me ... or may mean anyone.

Catchphrases

The one place where words and phrases do not have to have any sort of correlation between the English and the result would be politics. Such may be the case with "net neutrality." The idea belongs to you, to me, to anyone; at least in the case of hearing the idea that we don't want the internet tampered with pretty much equals "net neutrality" in terms that can be understood. Yet if politics were somehow to twist the idea such that it ended up meaning something other than what it means to rational faculty, it doesn't have to be a redefinition at all but can be -- as politics goes -- that it simply isn't this 'other thing, over there,' whereof the July 12th alert cites effort to establish Internet service provision as a utility for purposes of regulation.

In that way, this light isn't bright enough to read by at this point.

Looking at the words of Ajit Pai in cursory glance, all I see him doing in the initial publicity phase were to solicit input from concerned parties by threatening to axe regulations that refer to 'net neutrality.'

If net neutrality were an anchor, then you can hold on to it while those concerned parties attempt to ascertain what sort of words to use to understand what regulations have been and then may become, but there's not likely to be any reason to throw away that anchor because Ajit Pai has been quoted as citing that the Internet works very well, if not for existing regulations holding back ...

[1] Ajit: "I think the American public and particularly the people who’d be affected by it, deserve to see what regulations are going to be adopted before they’re formally adopted."

[2] Ajit: "... [I]t’s not that big of a leap to say that the FCC should be as open and transparent as the Internet itself. Simply publish the rules, let the American people see it, and I think they can make up their own minds."

Ajit Pai also compares 'net neutrality' to the ultimatum of getting all-you-can-eat at an eatery -- or nothing at all. This seems to be where the notion of 'net neutrality' drives off the rock face and down into the cliffhanger gully, as if exploding with all lost hope.

Clearly, 'net neutrality' has held the Internet together in the past, so "we" should be 'for' it, ... if "we" were still out there.

But the FCC in this way looks to be regarding the issue strictly in terms of the business profiting by putting out an inferior product that will possess the capacity in theory to access the whole net when in fact has decided to censor anything they don't want to be perceived as selling -- Manga comes to mind as an example of an entire Something that could be selectively avoided. "While being set ablaze, Manga can be harmful and potentially traumatic."

Originally, I think the idea to have been about accessibility on the data end -- that anyone providing data on the internet should be equally part of one big, vast databank. So, however does the matter get around to being an economic ultimatum of "get the best selection or nothing at all" innuendo spilling over to define net-neutrality?

We certainly already have plenty of ways to access "the Internet" so absolutely without access to content. Some devices will only check email without any browsing, for example. A Roku, Chromecast, AppleTV, or similar piece of hardware will let the user access video-only. At the device end, then, your net neutrality would appear to be cut off fully; while in fact, net neutrality isn't affected in fact because you still have the internet service and may hook up with a device that supports the wide range of protocols worthy of an internet browser or network-application, including video game.

However -- the idea that you can sign up with an internet service and let the ISP determine what won't be available to you -- that defines as what net-neutrality is not.

In theory, the FCC should be seeing that you get what you pay for. So if you wish to "get on the Internet," then you couldn't do so with a non net-neutrality provider.

Footnotes:

[1], [2] Quotes taken from http://reason.com/archives/2015/02/25/fccs-ajit-pai-on-net-neutrality-a-soluti/1

End of Notification Requesters

Since the dawn of computer mice, anyone who has used virtually any type of commercial computer has had to use the requester. You know the drill -- a little notification box appears on-screen with a message and the requisite 'OKAY' button that you have to click in order to get it to disappear.

A smarter technology would feature the box timed for a number of default or user-selected seconds and then disappear of its own accord. But wait -- we are not defeating the purpose of the message -- it can be retrieved, extension-style, by hovering mouse pointer over a special piece of screen real estate in a task bar or application launcher positioned somewhere on the screen.

So there you have the basics of how to stop screen requesters from being annoying while additionally making a little use of the abandoned 'log file.'

...

Some wonderful things have been done with screen technology -- pretty fodder for a separate post. You can expand your screen real estate in numerous ways using real applications that will provide desktop clutter only on demand. You will be glad to know that this can be achieved both by software as well as by the hardware method of fusing more than one monitor to your desktop.

Technically you can point at any number of obsolete 'screen features' that should had been changed a long time ago. Windows 8 wasn't quite 'it,' although it has provided a brilliant complement to standing tablet technologies. I have slept through 9 and 10, so let's not go into that ;-) At the moment, my Kindle Fire has enough power for the majority of what I want to accomplish, and this mobile keyboard solves the constrictive typing problem.

Living on Mars

Mars is the doubtful source of life in our solar system -- but could it make a feasable destination? Aspiring human earthworms need to know.

Something of a lifestyle revolution could be about to go off, in allusion to enthusiasts of space travel such as Elton Musk whose engineering genius foresees a 50-year window when colonization can next begin. A whole archeoleplex of science fiction both legacy and headed subscriber-way, plus more than a few magazines past and present from Omni to Discover have hashed out dreamy and terrifying scenarios of getting there and making a living.

Today the human limit imagines drab, submarine-sealed igloos situated with trapdoors leading to an underground labyrinth community, in essence positioned at strategic points along a pre-existing lava tube network. And there shall be work to do outside in space suits because the Armstrong test limit involved on the Martian surface isn't rather all that great for the complexion, with a 0.1% oxygen atmosphere on the poisonous side of a carbon dioxide index (0.7 as opposed to a something of a 0.1 maximum Earth tolerability on the given scale *****).

Wait ... we have 50 years to act and this were the opportunity of a lifetime to take an exotic vacation to the most hospitable artificial environment that you can fabricate in the interim. Here's why ...

Software, simulation, and a little but of nostalgia for Alien 2's Ripley cargo-loading mech outfit say the most of an engineering scenario cut out for an assembly line run of 1,000 satellite-com outfitted robots.

We'll be imagining laboring on earth in a virtual three-window by strapping on virtual reality gear to connect with one of these machines as it accomplishes any number of tasks:

• Drilling down through Martian rock • Producing molten material out of large crystal balls that focus solar heat into a very effective forge • Forming stairsteps • Creating rooms made of rock in the old style of chiseling. • Laying underground fiber optic networks to let in the sun above.

These machines would be designed for autonomous decisions that may veto any decision that could result in an unrecoverable fatality, such as falling down a ravine or walking off into a sandpit.

The software would be designed, in effect, to implement a virtual reality of dictating each of the mech's moves. Any lag in signal transit would be compensated for by the software end of the interface. Actions can be regarded as administered without need of direct feedback.

What the VR system would reproduce faithfully would be the conditions that the machine has to navigate in. You could experience the gravity as if it were your arm doing the work, get accurate temperature feedback, and hear actual acoustics of the grounding drone, and receive full data as if you were there from everything except the air quality. Gravitation could be demonstrated by rotating a sizeable disc platform at a very slow pace while managing to lift it up and let it fall down in a subtle manner that can let the falls be indicative of the gravitational sensation. Platform rotation challenges the reflexes to suppose there to be a definable difference -- assisted imagination with a relatively low-cost emulability twist.

The grounding drone would provide the sort of feedback that the engagement by the mech -- it could be any one of a handful of machine types -- has to encounter, taken from real-time digitized relay.

Artists could etch walls and even paint them with an optimized human android type of mech. These would be the human-like laborers, powered by batteries that must get their recharge from a supply of interchangeable batteries hosted by more than a few solar power recharging stations. The humanesque mechs would do dexterous tasks that their human counterparts rehearse for them by going through the VR, using precise telemetric data to interact with objects that use pins to represent features to mimic exact shape and tactile qualities. Telemetry provides the mechanized interface, and human interaction provides the grapple and dextrous movements. I'm envisioning the lag of realtime signal to be the reason four to twenty-four minutes of wait means that each act must be choreographed with a wing and a prayer. But smart software can supply something of a human rote as needed for robotic assistance by relaying the situation, representing it thermally by example, providing solids for demonstrated grips, and even giving the human "commander" gloves with the same features as humanoid android fingers.

Mining operations carried out by other mechs end up as full-scale as on Earth. Once raw materials can be accessed, beginning a formal engineering operation becomes possible, complete with capacity to make any type of thing that can be made on earth. From extraction of ores to pouring various shapes of interchangeable parts, any planet or asteroid can become a literal composition ready to host human visitation in style, as sophisticated as the greatest architectural accomplishment that can be named.

This basic sketch completes an introduction suggesting of fantastic capability yet untapped to terraform or terramine Mars prior to human visitation of the planet.

Nightmarish

I thought after seeing a bad trend among electronic devices -- which for some reason just had to include fascist bomber improvisations -- that chance encounters with tech left lying about in open spaces probably should be regarded like bombs. And this -- not only because Samsung's Galaxy 7 electronic abacus blew up, but because electronic devices would be the simplest of existing devices to convert into explosive potential.

Liberty Redux

I'm hoping that one day all you'll have to do would be to place any suspect electronic device into a small bombproof metal container and contact an electronics expert to get a professional breakdown on what you have discovered.

For the container, the instant it shuts it would trip off a gas exchange and fill with an inert gas such as Helium until detection equipment can sense no trace of oxygen. Whereby, foreseeably, any possibility of detonation may be prevented, although some explosive types could contain oxygen-rich chemistry.

Sure, why am I not saying contact a bomb squad? Because bomb squads should be privatized! Any professional who knows what to do could handle this type of scenario.

Great Betrayal

It seems that the last most obvious great betrayal of Americans at the hands of their federal government had been failure of the FDA to catch on to the risk of epoxied cans and other food containers. I remember suffering through this through the Clinton administration, from specifically 1996 and on until BPA (attributed contaminant) was apparently discontinued by companies I buy from.

I couldn't possibly know whether BPA itself were the culpible chemical, but by association I knew the bugaboo to come from the same fragrance of hardware store epoxy used straight out of a tube as well as certain hand cleansing disinfectants, polycarbonate lenses and tumblers, and food can linings. BPA simply turned up in website searches by people beefing out over food can epoxy liners, so I tended then as now to credit their acute perception ... with one caveat: my own findings.

My unexamined subconscious opinion was that the offending substance was left behind as a plastic curing agent when food cans were sprayed, that the epoxy was not fully dried before food was packed. One of the few canned foods I used was kidney beans and tomato products. There was something of a scented residue ribboned throughout a can's juices, almost sickly-sweet but on the epoxy side.

But given BPA's history, a resin invented by Dr. Hermann Schnell of Bayer in 1953 but first synthesized in 1891, its doesn't seem to pertain to the designated chemical but instead to the process by what BPA becomes subjected to harsh chemicals in order to anneal the compound into a solid out of the resin. Since different methods of inducing its solidification exist, such as through use of powerful hydrochloric acid or phenols, a serious possibility could be a change in how BPA conditioning had come to be applied.

Another possibility may be that intense heat from global warming triggers a chemical leaching effect while in transit during hotter months. That hypothesis weould go far to explainimg why this all took so frustratingly long for companies to adopt an alternative can liner. A typical update of quality reporting on BPA can be found in this recent report.

Personally, I suspect a chemical called Benzethonium chloride, notably used in epoxy for food cans, water-free hand cleanser, and in contraceptives as spermicide. You can also find it in topical medical applications such as liquid bandage. Its name may well be uniquely different in each application, but its danger were due to being a powerful disinfectant -- not an antiseptic and, thereby, no mere poison but what I would tend to regard as a free-flowing toxin.

I stand by my story on the epoxy-related Benzethonium chloride.

Take This Pledge for the Nov. 8th Election

The pledge:

**

"I promise myself to do a better job than the elected President on at least one issue of personal relevance each year of the new President's term. I do not like the standing direction that leadership in any of the major political parties has been going, so I make this pledge toward recognizing what demonstrated qualities deserve to represent our diverse peoples whom make up the USA."

**

This election, when you go to the polls to make your voice heard, use the write-in system to vote for yourself or anyone you think deserves recognition. Some states do not offer a write-in ticket, so there's not much you can do there.

Welcome visitors --

Hi, everyone;

Welcome to Optericus!

The blog's name derives from what it means to reference light from a virtual surface of complex integration potential. It were that sort of territory in concept. I want it to be easy in the scheme-of-things for those so-equipped to enjoy virtual reality as undemandingly as possible.

I'm looking to turn my mainstream computer research from Internet to anything about operating a computer into hindsight. We're more on the geeky side with hindsight, so I won't be writing articles about how to use a computer mouse but rather explain from my own experience such eclectic concepts as, "Why reality ate my hand."

I foresee that I'm coming from my college experience in psychology, which gets into such matters as human factors engineering, ergonomics, and user-friendliness that have sometimes never really been improved over the ones that began sometime during the early home computer revolution of the 1980's.

There shall be a PayPal contribution button visible on the site this time for in case I make anyone's day awesome. Maybe I can help someone find a dream job in technology by sharing what I know.

In the meantime I'm coming close to finishing up a career move into electronics troubleshooting and repair.